The SEC have fined various PE managers for undisclosed fees. Will the focus of future enforcement actions be something far more serious.....fake performance?
Many subscribe to the view that private investments outperform public market investments, due, it is said, to both a liquidity premium and the benefit of an ownership structure which moves management from a focus on quarterly reporting to a longer time horizon, better suited to value creation. Both are plausible arguments, and extensive allocations to private markets makes the "Yale model" (and pretty much all "sophisticated" large pension funds in 2018) very different from the traditional world of 60/40 stocks and bonds.
However, the industry has - belatedly - honed in on a key issue: what actually is the performance of private equity?
In a July 2017 article, the Financial Times wrote about "Private Equity's Dirty Secret" - the subscription credit line. Per the article:
This little-discussed technique, known as subscription-line financing, helps private equity managers earn performance fees because one of their funds’ key assessment metrics, the internal rate of return, is based on the date an investor’s cash is put to work.
“This sleight of hand artificially raises the fund’s apparent performance but it does nothing to increase the actual returns earned by investors,” says Jennifer Choi, managing director of industry affairs at ILPA.
ILPA’s criticisms echo recent comments by Howard Marks, co-founder of Oaktree Capital, the $100bn US alternative investment manager.
“A fund that used a subscription line and came in with a high IRR [internal rate of return] may not have done as good a job, or made its investors as much money as one that didn’t use a line,” says Mr Marks.
Meanwhile, in response to the ILPA article, the Fund Finance Association - the industry group for the banks providing credit lines - said they disagreed (who would have thought it!) with the International Limited Partners Association - here.
Moving the debate forward is an excellent research piece recently published by the consulting firm Cambridge Associates. As reported by Private Equity International, judicious use of subscription lines to defer capital calls and shorten the period of cash on cash returns can boost reported IRRs for PE vehicles by up to 300 basis points. Cambridge is quoted as saying:
"The returns-boosting power of subscription lines of credit have the GPs "pursuing them in droves, like a Black Friday shopping mob".
Finally, we came across an excellent LinkedIn article - "Lying Most Effectively with IRR" which provides some simple examples to illustrate the math behind the IRR scam.
What does this mean for diligence?
So, if we were to have a private equity checklist, it would be:
Quite a long ways to go, then.
1080 Côte du Beaver Hall, Suite 904
Canada, H2Z 1S8
84 Chain Lake Drive, Suite 501
Canada, B3S 1A2
+41 (0)44 296 90 60
Ground Floor, Two E-com Center
Mall of Asia Complex
Pasay City, Metro Manila
24th Floor Al Sila Tower, Suite 2422
Abu Dhabi Global Market Square
Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE
+971 (2) 694 8510
Level 36 Governor Phillip Tower
1 Farrer Place Sydney 2000
+61 (2) 8823 3370